|
New Moratorium, Old Song?
Research for Online Investors
by John Dalt
7/13/10
Diamond Offshore Drilling (DO) was the first company to move a
rig out of the Gulf of Mexico last
Friday.
Yesterday, they announced a
second deepwater rig was moving to waters off the
Republic of Congo due to the U.S. drilling
moratorium. The rig was under contract to Murphy
Oil through March 2012. The contract was renegotiated to a one
year commitment for operations in the Gulf when Murphy
can get permits.
Yesterday, the U.S. Interior Department issued a revised
deepwater drilling moratorium through November 30.
According to The Australian, the new moratorium is a
transparent rewrite of the old moratorium.
The new moratorium omits
references to deepwater operations over 500 feet, and
replaces the targeted operations as ‘any deep-water floating
facility with blow-out preventers.’ We covered the Judge’s ruling against the
government in Gulf Coast Workers-1, Obama-0 on June
22.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said, “I am basing my decision
on evidence that grows every day of the industry's inability in
the deep water to contain a catastrophic blowout, respond to an
oil spill and operate safely."
Sen. Mary Landrieu, a Louisiana Democrat, said in testimony to
the presidential oil spill panel that she was "alarmed" at the
Interior Department's statement that its decision is supported
"by an extensive record of existing and new
information.”
Landrieu said that statement
"contradicts testimony given by drilling experts and ignores
the history of oil and gas operations in the
Gulf."
Carl Rosenblum was one of the attorneys for plaintiffs suing to
stop the first moratorium. He said of the new moratorium, “we have
substantial concerns about its consistency with Judge Feldman's
order."
According to AFP, ‘Salazar
previously warned he would issue a new order to block deepwater
drilling, regardless how the court ruled, to back up the first
moratorium.’
In granting a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of the
first deep water drilling moratorium, Federal Judge Martin
Feldman ruled that the government acted in an arbitrary and
capricious manner, causing irreparable harm to the
plaintiffs.
It will be interesting to see how Judge Feldman views the
latest moratorium. Judges generally do not look kindly on
actions that appear to circumvent their
orders.
You can read Judge Feldman’s original
order.
It is full of facts and
plainly calls the government to task for
over-reaching.
Some interesting facts from Judge Feldman’s ruling jumped out
at your editor. Gulf
production accounts for 31% of total domestic crude oil, and
11% of total domestic, marketed natural gas production.
64% of all active leases are in
deepwater over 1000 feet.
A legal challenge to the new government moratorium should come
soon.
We will keep you apprised of
events as they happen. One insight, after three rebuffs by the
court, the government will have to pay plaintiff’s attorney
fees.
There are other remedies a
Federal Judge can use to punish bad
actors.
This may be fine
theatre!

The Wall Street Journal had a good article on Judge Feldman
last month, The Judge Behind the Ruling. The
article paints a picture of the kind of judge we would like
to have deciding a difficult
case.
Alcoa (AA) and CSX Corp. (CSX) reported good earnings with
upbeat forecasts. This was what the market needed, higher gross
sales (top line) and increasing profits (bottom
line).
Good guidance going forward gave
the market confidence that the economy was
growing.
Intel (INTC) reports after market
close tonight. The stock is up almost 2% today in
anticipation of a good report.
We also received U.S. Trade Balance numbers this morning that
showed imports increased 2.9% in May. Exports increased 2.4%, in spite of the
strengthening dollar. Exporters also are impacted by the Eurozone
credit problems and China’s slowdown in
imports.
Because of the slowdown in
imports to China, the U.S. trade deficit with the Middle
Kingdom hit a ten-month high.
The information presented in this
newsletter is based on generally available news releases,
corporate filings, current events, interviews and the editor’s
opinions.
It may contain errors and you
should not make investment decisions based solely on what you
believe you have read here. Do
your own research, it is your money. If
you lose it, it is your responsibility, not ours or your
grandmothers!
The editor may or may not have a
position in any securities discussed. The
editor may have held a position in a security earlier, or in
the future.
MarketToday Home Page
Back to
Top
|