|
Nuclear
Energy Institute (NEI)
Fukushima
Fact Sheet
April 2011
Key
Facts
The Japanese government raised the crisis level from 5 to 7 on
the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale for the events at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the
same rating as the Chernobyl
accident.
However, the accidents at the Chernobyl and
Fukushima reactors are starkly different. Notably, the reactor
designs are completely different and to date, the public health consequences at
Fukushima are much less severe.
Although some damage to the uranium fuel is
expected at Fukushima Daiichi, there have not been
releases of radiation into the atmosphere at the levels seen during the Chernobyl
accident.
The uncontrolled release of Chernobyl
reactor’s fission products was exacerbated by the failure of Soviet
authorities to take immediate action to protect surrounding populations. By contrast,
the Japanese authorities took early steps to evacuate people, distribute
potassium iodide, and restrict the transport and sale of food from the
region.
The Chernobyl accident left the area in a
30-kilometer radius around the facility as a long-term restricted zone.
It is unlikely that any significant areas of land in Japan will have long-term
restrictions.
Comparing Chernobyl and
Fukushima
As the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi
nuclear power plant continues, some are comparing events there to the
1986 accident at the Chernobyl reactor in the Soviet-era Ukraine. The Japanese
government raised the crisis level from 5 to 7 on
the International Nuclear and Radiological Event
Scale, the same
rating as the Chernobyl accident. Yet the accidents at the Chernobyl and Fukushima reactors
are starkly different. Notably, the reactor designs
are completely different; and to date, the public health consequences at Fukushima are much less
severe.
Accident
Conditions
The Fukushima event has been rated 7 on
the International Nuclear and Radiological Event
Scale, the
same level as the 1986 Chernobyl accident. Even so, Japanese authorities estimate that
radiation released at Fukushima is only 10 percent of the amount released from
the Ukrainian plant. A level 7 event, the highest on the rating scale,
is considered a “major accident.” It applies to an event with “a major
release of radioactive material with widespread health and environmental effects
requiring implementation of planned and extended countermeasures,” according to
the International Atomic Energy Agency, which sponsors the ratings. The Japanese government set the rating, which it
considers “provisional” and subject to
change.
Chernobyl was an old Soviet-design reactor,
with less stable characteristics and no robust containment structures like
most power reactors worldwide. Unconventional reactor operations at Chernobyl resulted
in a
runaway power surge followed by steam and hydrogen explosions and a sustained fire in the
reactor.
Absent a containment structure, the explosions
propelled radioactive material from the reactor core high into the
atmosphere and across eastern and western Europe for at least 10
days.
The earthquake and tsunami that struck the
Fukushima Daiichi reactors resulted in the loss of on- and offsite electricity
temporarily and halted cooling of the fuel in the reactor cores and used fuel pools.
There have been explosions at three of the reactors as a result of hydrogen
buildup, but the reactor fuel remains inside the primary containment structures.
Although some damage to the uranium fuel is expected, there have not been
releases of radiation into the atmosphere at the levels seen during the Chernobyl
accident.
Emergency
Response
The uncontrolled release of Chernobyl
reactor’s fission products was exacerbated by the failure of Soviet authorities to
take immediate action to protect surrounding populations. The most discernible health
effect from Chernobyl—thyroid cancer in children—could have been mitigated by the
early and widespread use of radiation protection procedures such as
distribution of potassium iodide and control of the food supply in affected
areas.
By contrast, the Japanese authorities took
early steps to evacuate people from a 12.5-mile zone around the Fukushima
plant. Authorities also distributed potassium iodide to residents near the plant and
restricted the transport and sale of milk (the main source of radioactive iodine intake), leafy
vegetables and other food from the region. The
Japanese government is monitoring and reporting radiation levels to citizens
on an ongoing basis and is providing information and health protection instructions to the
public.
Besides child thyroid cancer, no other health
effects have been detected in the populations around Chernobyl,
according to a 2008 report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of
Atomic Radiation.
Based on all information to date, no health
effects are expected among the Japanese people as a result of the events at
Fukushima.
Long-Term Health
Effects
The unique nature of the Chernobyl accident
resulted in widespread airborne dispersion of radioactive cesium as
fallout, which has a half-life of 30 years. The incident left the area in a 30- kilometer
radius around the facility as a long-term restricted
zone.
Although measurements of radioactivity in the
air and water near the Fukushima plant have been evident at varying
levels, wide dispersion of radioactive materials has not occurred at the facility. While there
may be localized spots that will require monitoring and remediation, it is
unlikely that any significant areas of land in Japan will have long-term
restrictions.
Back to Top
|