|
Cuomo vs Bank of America
Research for Online Investors
by John Dalt
9/16/09
A year ago, Bank of America
agreed to buy Merrill Lynch in a shotgun wedding orchestrated
by the FDIC and U.S. Treasury. The deal occurred in the middle of the
financial meltdown. BAC had received $25 billion in bailout
funds, and an additional $20 billion to absorb the losses in
the Merrill Lynch
purchase.
Ken Lewis, CEO of BAC, considered
backing out of the deal by invoking the material adverse change
(MAC) clause of the contract. This caused heartburn in the
government. Merrill losses
were mounting, and BAC had a shareholder meeting to approve the
purchase on December 5, 2008 BAC is facing shareholder lawsuits for not
disclosing the Merrill Lynch losses and the questions
management had concerning the investment
bank.
Management had a fiduciary duty
to share all material information with the
shareholders.
In addition to the shareholder
suits, it is a crime if Cuomo can prove that the board
and/or Lewis withheld information. The very fact that the board considered
backing out of the deal may have required
disclosure.
Paulson told Lewis he did not
want anything in writing concerning losses at Merrill or future
backstops the Treasury may offer. This was to avoid a “reportable
event.”
Lewis testified before a grand
jury in February in New York that he felt threatened by Paulson
and Bernanke.
Treasury’s Hank Paulson told
Lewis that a failed deal would destabilize the nation’s banking
system and call into question the capability of BAC's
board.
Bernanke tag teamed Lewis with a
caution that if BAC backed out of the deal, management and the
board of directors may be replaced as a condition for BAC to
receive any more bailout funds or consideration from the
government.
The New York Attorney General,
Andrew Cuomo has filed paperwork to depose directors of Bank of
America (BAC) concerning the acquisition of Merrill
Lynch.
We covered this story when Ken
Lewis’s testimony was leaked on April 23, 2009 in our article,
“BOA, Shut Up and
Buy It.”
Lewis was called before congress,
followed by Paulson and Bernanke. The fire was fanned, but all parties were
very careful in their testimony. Cuomo won’t give up. He is trying to make a name for
himself.
He seems to be on a mission to be
on TV more than his brother who hosts Good Morning America on
ABC.
I think he wants to run for
daddy’s old post and live in the governor’s
mansion.
Max Baucus (D. MT) filed his bill
with the Senate to overhaul the nation’s health
care.
The “gang of six” senators have
been working on this bill. It is more sausage, costing $856 billion in
the first ten years. To get the cost this low, the taxes start
immediately, but benefits are phased in through
2013.
This gets the democrats through
the next two elections without people realizing how bad the
program is, or how much it
costs.
Baucus’s bill would extend
coverage to 95% of the population, leaving about 15 million
uninsured. Something is
wrong with the math, why spend $856 billion to cure half the
problem? That is spending
over $9,500 per additional insured person per year (six
years). Only in
Washington. You can read
my simple plan for health care reform from July 28,
"Health Care, A
Plan." Moreover, I think it would be revenue
neutral.
Life is stranger than fiction,
Linda McMahon of World Wrestling Federation is going to run for
Senate against Chris Dodd (D. Conn). One of her Republican primary opponents said,
"I am going to run a campaign Connecticut can be proud of, no
head-butting, eye-gouging or
hair-pulling."
“Good
article! Good writing...certainly keeps my attention,
thanks.”---subscriber
C.H.
Thanks for the compliment C.H.,
even a blind man can hit a golf ball once in awhile.—John
Dalt
The information presented in this newsletter is based on
generally available news releases, corporate filings, current
events, interviews and the editor’s opinions. It may contain errors and you
should not make investment decisions based solely on what you
believe you have read here. Do your own research, it is
your money. If you
lose it, it is your responsibility, not ours or your
grandmothers! The
editor may or may not have a position in any securities
discussed. The
editor may have held a position in a security earlier, or in
the future.
MarketToday Home
Page
Back
to Top
|