|
Corporate Responsibility
Research for Online Investors
by John Dalt
8/23/10
What is
the primary purpose of a “for profit”
corporation?
Why do you buy stock in a company? Do you decide to own a
piece of a company because they constantly increase
profits and grow, or because they are ecologically
friendly and sponsor philanthropic events in the city or
state where their headquarters are
located?
The Wall
Street Journal carries an article today, “The Case Against Corporate Social
Responsibility.” It is worth a read, but
misses a point that has been a burr in my saddle as long as
I have been in business. Whether a local small
business or a public company, what makes society believe a
company has any responsibility other than make
money?
Ok, a
small business is an extension of the owner. If he chooses to sponsor the
local girls’ softball team, it is his money and he can spend it
as he sees fit. So
much the better that he can expense the cost of his daughter
having a nice uniform! I know many small businesses that
budget a small amount for local 'feel good' advertising.
Who hasn't been asked to sponsor a page in the local paper
congratulating the Graduating Senior
Class?
The key to
this sponsorship is the owner of the business is willing to
make less money out of his business because he chose to spend
it on a philanthropic expense. You could call it
advertising. The
value would be lost on a business that sells a manufactured
item to a market outside the local reach of the softball
team.

The team
would probably give the small business owner a nice trophy and
team picture. As a
stockholder in a public company, do you care if the officers of
the company have trophies and pictures from sponsoring local
events?
There may
be some value as your employees feel good about the company but
would probably rather have it in their paycheck. I tend
to vote with the employees, I would rather have the money in my
paycheck! I have to admit, our company sponsored the
middle school talent contest for ten years while our girls
where in school and participating. It was a small amount
of money, and made us proud to be part of a fun event for the
kids. But, I never had one customer call for a quote
because of this sponsorship.
Do you
think companies should maximize profits, distribute as much as
possible to the shareholders and let us make decisions on our
charitable gifts?
Not every company pays a dividend, but shouldn’t they execute
their plan to maximize stockholder
value?
The
article referenced today addresses larger public
issues. Should
public companies spend money on social welfare, pollution
controls beyond what is required by law, or limit the marketing
of products offered to those perceived as “good” for the
consumer?
Should
McDonalds (MCD) quit selling Big Macs because they contain too
much fat? Should
Ford (F) quite selling pickups they use too much
gasoline? Should
Smith & Wesson (SWHC) just close down because some people
don’t believe we should have guns? Can you believe that Coke and
Pepsi have agreed to take soft drinks out of schools, because
of pressure from groups concerned about childhood
obesity?
These
views may seem extreme, especially if you own one of these
companies. But there
are some that believe all of the above are the socially
responsible actions to take. Personally, I prefer to own
companies headed by executives that work every day to make
profits for shareholders, leave the charity and social
responsibility to the owners. We can spend our own money how
we see fit!
You can
read the Wall Street Journal article, and follow
our lead. Vote
out board members that don’t produce value for owners the
next time you vote your proxy.
Quote:
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating
the wealth out of prosperity.
What one person receives without working for, another person
must work for without receiving.
The government cannot give to anybody anything that the
government does not first take from somebody
else.
You cannot multiply wealth by dividing
it.
When half of the people get the idea that they do not have
to work because the other half is going to take care of them,
and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to
work, because somebody else is going to get what they work for,
that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any
nation.---Dr. Adrian Rogers
The information presented in this newsletter is based on
generally available news releases, corporate filings, current
events, interviews and the editor’s opinions. It may contain errors and you
should not make investment decisions based solely on what you
believe you have read here. Do your own research, it is your
money. If you lose
it, it is your responsibility, not ours or your
grandmothers! The
editor may or may not have a position in any securities
discussed. The editor
may have held a position in a security earlier, or in the
future.
MarketToday Home
Page
Back
to Top
|