|
Coal, Cheap Clean and
Plentiful
Research for Online Investors
by John Dalt
7/20/10
Our state
has had a three year political battle over building a
coal-fired electrical generation plant. You would think that a prairie
state (red) was conservative, but you might be
wrong. One of the
amazing things about living in a red state is every politician
recognizes the importance of the republican brand, but does not
respect conservative values.
I suppose
this also happens in blue states, where everyone labels
themselves as a democrat, but all are not as hell bent on
rushing to socialism as their leaders in Washington
are. It must be one
heck of a wake-up call the first time they get their arm
twisted by the house whip.
With this
backdrop, I came across some interesting information this week
about coal. In the
last thirty years, the U.S. has tripled consumption of
coal. More than 50%
of our electricity is currently generated using
coal. During the
time that our use has increased, coal emissions have been
reduced by 40%. Last
year our consumption decreased by 10.7% because of the credit
crisis and slowing economic growth.
According
to the Energy Information Agency (EIA), scrubbers on old coal
plants remove 99% of the toxic pollutants that escape from
their chimneys.
Plants built earlier than the last few years (with the latest
technology) are getting these scrubbers at a fast
pace. By the end of
2011, over half of the old coal fired electrical plants will
have scrubbers in use. That accounts for 90.6
gigawatts of electricity generated with “clean”
energy.
The debate
and politics surrounding alternative energy don’t always
recognize the importance that fossil fuels play in our
lives. The U.S.
burns 3.8 tons of coal per year for every
citizen. It
accounts for 94% of our fossil fuel energy reserves, and
we have enough to last 235 years, about 238 billion
tons.
For the
U.S. to wean ourselves off coal, we would have to build 250
nuclear plants or 500 more Hoover Dams. How many solar panels would it
take? At a
coal-fired electrical generation plant in Colorado, there are
6.8 acres of solar panels. These solar panels save 900
tons of coal per year. This is considered
efficient.
The U.S.
consumed one billion tons of coal in 2009. A little back of envelope math
tells us the U.S. would have to cover 7.5 million acres with
solar panels! There
goes the neighborhood.

According
to the Vancouver Sun, China consumes more energy
than the United States. New data from the
International Energy Agency (IEA) showed that China passed
the U.S. in 2009.
China uses about half the crude oil the U.S., uses, but much
more coal. The
U.S. exports coal to China. China plans to build 1,000
gigawatts of new electrical generation capacity in the next
15 years.
We have a
great coal company in our Long-Term
Portfolio. It
is organized as a Partnership, so it distributes 90% of
the earnings to unitholders. The partnership doesn’t
pay taxes and we get a write off against our ‘dividends’
for capital expenses and depreciation. We bought this stock in
May and are already up 18%! Even at the current high
stock price, the partnership pays over 6% annualized
dividend. If
you would like to own stocks like this, and have us
monitor your holdings, why not join Galt’s Long-Term
Portfolio?
Goldman
Sachs disappointed the market this morning with earnings of
$613 million, down from $3.43 billion in the second quarter of
2009. Revenue was
down 36% at $8.84 billion compared to $13.76 billion a year
ago. Earnings were
hurt by the $550 million SEC fine and $600 million for a new
British bank payroll tax. The stock was down early, but
by mid-day had clawed its way back to the green
column. The
New York Times covers GS’s
earnings.
Orin Hatch
(R. Utah) appeared on CNBC’s Kudlow last night. He said the
democrats are trying to build a “dependency constituency.” He
continued that the democrat’s goal is to have 60% of the U.S.
population dependent on the government for benefits to insure
control of the government. They are well on their way. After 80
years it is nice that one Republican has figured it
out.
To the
mailbag:
The big
banks will get bigger by absorbing the little banks or putting
them out of business so that consumers have no choice but to go
to them!! Total monopoly of the banking system!
MAJOR ROBBER BARRONS HAVE TAKEN OVER.----paid up subscriber
T.M.
John’s
reply: A continuing
process of regulation and choking out the capitalist
system. We wrote
about the cost of compliance in MarketToday on June 25,
2010. The costs will
hurt the big banks, but make small banks
unprofitable. The
democrat reformers have just handed the small banks to the big
boys on a silver platter. All at the cost of the average
American consumer!
I watched Obama state that BP will do nothing the government
doesn't tell them to do, and exactly and only what the
gov't. tells them to do it. I've noticed that when things
are going well, he uses "We", and when they aren't, he uses
"They". Now they've
either blown a hole in the well or forced the oil & gas to
exit via an existing hole, possibly enlarging it. But the
Obamob has told them to keep the cap on for another 24 hours!
Wonderful! If they
keep the cap on long enough, maybe they can blow a nice
hole in the ocean floor as an eternal monument to
bureaucratic stupidity! What's with these idiots? Why
haven't they told BP to put on a riser and let the
production flow to the ships above (like you suggested a couple
of letters back)? We
enjoy your letters!—subscriber
W.H.
John’s
reply:
I did not
expand on this Monday, because I feel like we have
covered it and our readers know how stupid these actions
are. It
absolutely amazes me that they are taking this
risk. There
was a press conference late Monday night, where Thad
Allen admitted they have leakage on the floor close to
the well.
Either my information about the danger of these actions
is completely wrong, or these guys are playing with
fire. There is
not recovery if it blows out. Hofmeister called it
a "volcano."
Wow.
The information presented in this newsletter is based on
generally available news releases, corporate filings, current
events, interviews and the editor’s opinions. It may contain errors and you
should not make investment decisions based solely on what you
believe you have read here. Do your own research, it is your
money. If you lose
it, it is your responsibility, not ours or your
grandmothers! The
editor may or may not have a position in any securities
discussed. The editor
may have held a position in a security earlier, or in the
future.
MarketToday Home Page
Back to
Top
|